5 thoughts on “Guangzhou pet shop loses the pet owner to claim 30,000 dogs. Is the owner's claim request reasonably?”
Velma
The owner of a pet dog sent the pet dog to the pet shop to take a bath. I did not expect that the pet dog was lost by the pet shop, so the owner of the pet dog spent more than 20,000 yuan to invite the professional team to help him successfully find the pet's pet. dog. Therefore, the owner of the pet dog made a claim to the pet shop and asked the pet store to compensate nearly 30,000 yuan for dog hunting fees. Faced with such high compensation costs, the pet shop is of course rejected. After all, the amount of dogs is indeed a bit high, of course, it is unreasonable. According to the owner of the pet dog, after the pet dog is lost, he also mediates with the pet shop under the organization of the local public security bureau. The operator of the pet shop also said that it will help the pet dog owner to find the lost pet dog. However, after the incident, the owner of the pet dog found that the operator of the pet shop did not fulfill relevant obligations and never found a pet dog. So I paid for a professional team to find a pet dog. So after finding a pet dog, the owner of the pet dog asked the pet shop to compensate him. In addition to the search fee of more than 20,000 yuan, there is also the treatment cost of pet dogs and mental loss. A total of more than 30,000 yuan. The editor believes that although the owner of the pet dog does spend so much money in the process of looking for a pet dog, all of them are required to make compensation for pet shops to be unreasonable. After all, it is a professional team that should be negotiated with pet shops. Eventually, after the court's decision, the operator of the pet shop was sentenced to compensation for the pet dog owner of 5,000 yuan and a treatment fee of 840 yuan. But the owner of the pet dog expressed dissatisfaction with the result, and may feel that the compensation is too little. However, when looking for pet dogs, it is not only the way to hire a professional team. After all, the fees for professional teams are still very high. Under the premise of knowing that the professional team hires a high cost, the professional team is still hired to find pet dogs, and the ultimate loss will still bear a large part.
The pet shop loses the pet owner to claim 30,000 dogs. Unexpectedly, the pet dog was lost, and the owner spent more than 20,000 yuan in high costs to find the pet dog. The pet store refuted that the treatment fee was packet, but the cost of dog search was nearly 30,000 yuan, which was too high. The owner's claim requirement is unreasonable
The dogs who lost their guests to the guests were claimed to claim 30,000 yuan. I still feel that it is more reasonable. After all, the owner's feelings for enough feelings can not be measured by money, and the dogs are obliged to protect the dog's safety in the pet shop staff.
It depends on the situation. First of all, the loss of pet dogs is the responsibility of a pet shop, and it should make compensation in itself. In addition, the owner's labor and labor can be found, and it should indeed get corresponding compensation.
I personally think that the owner's claim is unreasonable, because the current important thing is to find the lost pet dog first instead of asking for the cost of dogs first.
The owner of a pet dog sent the pet dog to the pet shop to take a bath. I did not expect that the pet dog was lost by the pet shop, so the owner of the pet dog spent more than 20,000 yuan to invite the professional team to help him successfully find the pet's pet. dog. Therefore, the owner of the pet dog made a claim to the pet shop and asked the pet store to compensate nearly 30,000 yuan for dog hunting fees.
Faced with such high compensation costs, the pet shop is of course rejected. After all, the amount of dogs is indeed a bit high, of course, it is unreasonable. According to the owner of the pet dog, after the pet dog is lost, he also mediates with the pet shop under the organization of the local public security bureau. The operator of the pet shop also said that it will help the pet dog owner to find the lost pet dog. However, after the incident, the owner of the pet dog found that the operator of the pet shop did not fulfill relevant obligations and never found a pet dog. So I paid for a professional team to find a pet dog.
So after finding a pet dog, the owner of the pet dog asked the pet shop to compensate him. In addition to the search fee of more than 20,000 yuan, there is also the treatment cost of pet dogs and mental loss. A total of more than 30,000 yuan. The editor believes that although the owner of the pet dog does spend so much money in the process of looking for a pet dog, all of them are required to make compensation for pet shops to be unreasonable. After all, it is a professional team that should be negotiated with pet shops. Eventually, after the court's decision, the operator of the pet shop was sentenced to compensation for the pet dog owner of 5,000 yuan and a treatment fee of 840 yuan.
But the owner of the pet dog expressed dissatisfaction with the result, and may feel that the compensation is too little. However, when looking for pet dogs, it is not only the way to hire a professional team. After all, the fees for professional teams are still very high. Under the premise of knowing that the professional team hires a high cost, the professional team is still hired to find pet dogs, and the ultimate loss will still bear a large part.
The pet shop loses the pet owner to claim 30,000 dogs. Unexpectedly, the pet dog was lost, and the owner spent more than 20,000 yuan in high costs to find the pet dog. The pet store refuted that the treatment fee was packet, but the cost of dog search was nearly 30,000 yuan, which was too high. The owner's claim requirement is unreasonable
The dogs who lost their guests to the guests were claimed to claim 30,000 yuan. I still feel that it is more reasonable. After all, the owner's feelings for enough feelings can not be measured by money, and the dogs are obliged to protect the dog's safety in the pet shop staff.
It depends on the situation. First of all, the loss of pet dogs is the responsibility of a pet shop, and it should make compensation in itself. In addition, the owner's labor and labor can be found, and it should indeed get corresponding compensation.
I personally think that the owner's claim is unreasonable, because the current important thing is to find the lost pet dog first instead of asking for the cost of dogs first.